On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 23:52 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:28:48 -0700
> Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:18:11AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > No, he means that kmap_atomic can only map a page of data. This makes
> > > single page only sg list entries and input assumption into this loop.
> > > with ENABLE_CLUSTERING, that's potentially not true. Of course, this
> > > accidentally works most of the time because of the way kmap functions.
> >
> > Ah, right. I'm on the verge of releasing a ram-based scsi driver I've
> > been working on ... this loop should work fine with clustering as it
> > takes account of the sg potentially having multiple pages:
> >
> > scsi_for_each_sg(cmnd, sg, scsi_sg_count(cmnd), i) {
> > struct page *sgpage = sg_page(sg);
> > unsigned int to_off = sg->offset;
> > unsigned int sg_copy = sg->length;
> > if (sg_copy > len)
> > sg_copy = len;
> > len -= sg_copy;
>
> stex driver has a similar function to copies data between a buffer and
> a scatter list. I think that scsi_kmap_atomic_sg is a bit primitive
> (and not very popular). I'll send a patch to add a helper function to
> scsi_lib.c that copies data between a buffer and a scatter list. It
> would be useful for several drivers.
Actually, if you're going to sweep up them all, libata also does this.
However, mapping and copying data isn't a SCSI specific function, it's
one any virtual block driver should do, so I think block might be the
correct location for such a function.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
