On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:44:16 -0500 (EST)
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > in drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:
> >
> > ...
> > #if defined(CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY)
> > /* Some platforms with PCI limits cannot address compat
> > port space. In that case we punt if their firmware has
> > left a device in compatibility mode */
> > if (legacy_mode) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "ata: Compatibility mode ATA is not supported on this platform, skipping.\n");
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
> > #endif
> > ...
> >
> > there is no Kconfig file that defines that variable -- should that
> > test be removed? or is something eventually coming that defines it?
>
> It is used by some of the unsubmitted tree stuff certainly and is there
> because some platforms will need it (eg FRV).
ok, good enough, i'm just trying to cull my list of unreferenced
Kconfig variables.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Home page: http://crashcourse.ca
Fedora Cookbook: http://crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Fedora_Cookbook
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
