Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Is this NACK on the patchset or can we update PMP access later? > > Sorry, yes, it is a NAK: polling should not be requirement. > > I considered making multi-protocol ->qc_issue() a requirement too, but > that seemed like it might delay things too much. But consider this a > strong to-do item... ->pmp_read and ->pmp_write hooks should be folded > into ->qc_issue and ata_qc_complete(), because quite often a PMP > read/write packet can be delivered just like any other packet. We want > a single "submit packet to hardware" interface, not multiple ones. Aieee... Another merge delay. I wish the review process proceeded a bit swifter. The patchset has been around literally for years now and submitted for review six times if I have the take number right. :-( -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
