Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch for Intel Tolapai

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gaston, Jason D wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Gaston, Jason D
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:10 AM
To: 'Jeff Garzik'
Cc: linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch
for
Intel Tolapai

This device has both AHCI and RAID modes that use the ahci driver.
Only
the RAID mode DID's are being added as the PCI class code support will
cover the AHCI mode.  Looking at the Generic, PCI class code support
section, it uses "board_ahci".  I assumed that they should be the same
as
the generic class code support is working on this platform.

Thanks,

Jason


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:47 AM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch
for
Intel Tolapai

Jason Gaston wrote:
Resend trying to remove 8-bit characters in the email.

This patch adds the Intel Tolapai RAID controller DID's for SATA
support.
Signed-off-by:  Jason Gaston <jason.d.gaston@xxxxxxxxx>

--- linux-2.6.23-rc4/drivers/ata/ahci.c.orig	2007-08-27
18:32:35.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc4/drivers/ata/ahci.c	2007-08-28
16:58:11.000000000 -
0700
@@ -411,6 +411,8 @@
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x292f), board_ahci_pi }, /* ICH9M */
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x294d), board_ahci_pi }, /* ICH9 */
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x294e), board_ahci_pi }, /* ICH9M */
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x502a), board_ahci }, /* Tolapai */
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x502b), board_ahci }, /* Tolapai */
Why did you not use board_ahci_pi?  Is the AHCI ports-implemented
register unreliable on this platform?

Jeff,

Do I need to change this to board_ahci_pi or is it ok to leave it at
board_ahci, which will be used by the AHCI class code devices?

You are the one who needs to answer this question ;-)

Most new Intel AHCI have a sane and reliable Ports-Implemented register value even across reset, unlike earlier ones or some clones. For those, we use board_ahci_pi.

If PI is not reliable across reset or if BIOS is absent (yes we care about that case, when we do our own PCI resume for example), then you should use board_ahci.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux