On Sep 5 2007 09:48, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On 8/28/07, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Aug 25 2007 15:37, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >> > > >> > >A broken cable seems like a realistic possibility, so i swapped it for >> > >another cable. I will try if that solves the problem. >> > >> > Hi, did you have any success/failure, other updates? >> > I am facing a similar problem (just posted to linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), >> > but also with 2.6.18, and it does not look like an NCQ or loose cable problem (got a >> > backplane, and sda is working normal). > >This is a rather comedic email thread, with people top-posting, others >leaving others off the cc list, Robert's MUA reliably and inexplicably >mangling both In-Reply-To: and References: thus breaking threading, no >visible sign of how Jan got involved and no linux-ide cc's. I wrote Maarten a private mail, w/o any mailing lists CCed or BCCed, but with References: (just hit reply button and removed CCs) because I assumed his problem was really just the cabling in the end, which does not apply to me at all. >Enough time has passed for everyone to forget all about this. So Maarten, >if you still believe that this is still a kernel bug then please update us >on its status and provide a full description for linux-ide.. Please use >reply-to-all for that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
