Re: Resets on sil3124 & sil3726 PMP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,

Petr Vandrovec wrote:
I have recompiled kernel with all debugging disabled, and it brought me
1.5MBps, so it is still consistently 1MBps slower than on sil. Disabling
NCQ seems to improve concurrent access a bit (for which I have no
explanation), while slows down single drive scenario:

With NCQ:

1TB alone: 81.22, 79.86
1TB+1TB:   56.28+56.70, 53.51+56.11

Without NCQ:

1TB alone: 79.78, 80.82
1TB+1TB:   57.99+58.12, 56.50+56.46

3124-2 (norco 4618):

NCQ:

1TB alone:   82.30, 82.43
1TB+1TB:     68.36+68.25

noNCQ:

1TB alone:   82.39, 82.29
1TB+1TB:     70.33+70.32, 69.47+70.01

Unfortunately that enclosure has only two slots used. I'll try to not forget bring two more disks tomorrow to get it fully populated.

3512 sil, no NCQ:

1TB alone: 82.28, 82.18
1TB+1TB:   47.20+47.54    # Here apparently command based switching or
1.5Gbps link between device and PMP becomes bottleneck

Hmmmm.... Weird.  Is the different still there if you take PMP out of
the picture?

Will do tomorrow.  I need physical access to the box to do that.
								Petr

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux