Em Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:42:50 +0900 Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: | HDS724040KLSA80 reports that it supports HPA && LBA48 but craps itself | on READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT. Implement BROKEN_HPA horkage and apply it to | the drive. If the horkage is set, all HPA operations are skipped. | | While at it, make HPA test a bit more reliable by also checking | ata_id_has_hpa(). Tejun, is the following patch ok for 2.6.22.1? --- linux-2.6.22.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c +++ linux-2.6.22/drivers/ata/libata-core.c @@ -1939,7 +1939,8 @@ int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_FLUSH_EXT; } - if (ata_id_hpa_enabled(dev->id)) + if (!(dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA) && + ata_id_has_hpa(id) && ata_id_hpa_enabled(dev->id)) dev->n_sectors = ata_hpa_resize(dev); /* config NCQ */ @@ -3800,6 +3801,7 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry { "HTS541612J9SA00", "SBDIC7JP", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, { "Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00", "SB4OC70P", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, { "WDC WD740ADFD-00NLR1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, + { "HDS724040KLSA80", "KFAOA20N", ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA, }, /* Devices with NCQ limits */ --- linux-2.6.22.orig/include/linux/libata.h +++ linux-2.6.22/include/linux/libata.h @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ enum { ATA_HORKAGE_NODMA = (1 << 1), /* DMA problems */ ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ = (1 << 2), /* Don't use NCQ */ ATA_HORKAGE_MAX_SEC_128 = (1 << 3), /* Limit max sects to 128 */ + ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA = (1 << 4), /* Broken HPA */ }; enum hsm_task_states { -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html