Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement ata_link, take 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 17:42 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> This is the sixth take of implement ata_link patchset.  This patchset
>> contains 14 patches which can be categorized as follows.
>>
>> #01-02: implement ata_link
>> #03-06: make libata deal with link instead of port
>> #07-09: misc link stuff (link init, reset_tries, ata_link_abort())
>> #10-14: add ap->pmp_link[] and update libata to deal with multiple
>> 	links
>>
>> ata_link abstracts PHY and sits between ata_port and ata_device.  The
>> following attributes are moved to ata_link from ata_port.
>>
>> - active command state (active_tag, sactive)
>> - [hw_]sata_spd_limit
>> - eh_info and eh_context
>> - device array
>>
>> With above and a few extra fields, a link can handle attached devices
>> including qc management and EH/hotplug.  This patchset makes libata
>> ready to handle PMP links.
>>
>> Changes from the last take[L] are.
>>
>> * adapted to the current upstream
>>
>> This patchset is against
>>
>>   libata-dev#upstream (80c51b13d8a73b9346ebe849cdeac6f539066fc2)
> 
> Sorry; there's another piece now: libsas:  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> will need similar treatment to ipr.

Ah... right.  Sorry about that.  Will regenerate the patchset.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux