Re: [PATCH libata-dev#upstream] libata: implement and use ata_port_desc() to report port configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Looks as sane an approach. Some obvious errors in the conversion but
> > simply wrong types I/O v MMIO etc not flaws in the proposal
> 
> Care to point out?

I didn't save it but it was things like HPT3x3 seemed to be claiming to
be MMIO - trivial stuff we can clean up in a merge.

> 
> > Unfortunately there is one big horror you've left unconverted - the status
> > address printing in ata_wait_... That is why I ended up going the way I
> > did.
> 
> The only thing I can find is DPRINTK in ata_wait_idle() which can and
> should simply be converted to ata_port_printk("abnormal Status 0x%x\n",
> status).  After all some controller don't even have Status register (FIS
> based ones, ahci, sil24).

That is probably very sensible yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux