Re: [PATCH 8/15] ide: remove ide_find_best_pio_mode()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

* Add ->host_flags to ide_hwif_t to store ide_pci_device_t.host_flags,
  assign it in setup-pci.c:ide_pci_setup_ports().

* Add IDE_HFLAG_PIO_NO_{BLACKLIST,DOWNGRADE} to ide_pci_device_t.host_flags
  and teach ide_get_best_pio_mode() about them.  Also remove needless
  !drive->id check while at it (drive->id is always present).

* Convert amd74xx, via82cxxx and ide-timing.h to use ide_get_best_pio_mode()
  and then remove no longer needed ide_find_best_pio_mode().

There should be no functionality changes caused by this patch.

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

   Still I have something to ask...

Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-lib.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-lib.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-lib.c
@@ -291,11 +291,11 @@ u8 ide_get_best_pio_mode (ide_drive_t *d
 	struct hd_driveid* id = drive->id;
 	int overridden  = 0;
- if (mode_wanted != 255) {
-		pio_mode = mode_wanted;
-	} else if (!drive->id) {
-		pio_mode = 0;
-	} else if ((pio_mode = ide_scan_pio_blacklist(id->model)) != -1) {
+	if (mode_wanted != 255)
+		return min_t(u8, mode_wanted, max_mode);
+
+	if ((drive->hwif->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_PIO_NO_BLACKLIST) == 0 &&

   C also has ! operator. ;-)

+	    (pio_mode = ide_scan_pio_blacklist(id->model)) != -1) {
 		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: is on PIO blacklist\n", drive->name);
 	} else {
 		pio_mode = id->tPIO;
@@ -324,7 +324,8 @@ u8 ide_get_best_pio_mode (ide_drive_t *d
 		/*
 		 * Conservative "downgrade" for all pre-ATA2 drives
 		 */
-		if (pio_mode && pio_mode < 4) {
+		if ((drive->hwif->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_PIO_NO_DOWNGRADE) == 0 &&

   It really does! :-)

+		    pio_mode && pio_mode < 4) {
 			pio_mode--;
 			printk(KERN_INFO "%s: applying conservative "
 					 "PIO \"downgrade\"\n", drive->name);
Index: b/drivers/ide/pci/amd74xx.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/pci/amd74xx.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/pci/amd74xx.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /*
- * Version 2.20
+ * Version 2.21
  *
  * AMD 755/756/766/8111 and nVidia nForce/2/2s/3/3s/CK804/MCP04
  * IDE driver for Linux.
@@ -275,10 +275,8 @@ static int amd_set_drive(ide_drive_t *dr
static void amd74xx_tune_drive(ide_drive_t *drive, u8 pio)
 {
-	if (pio == 255) {
-		amd_set_drive(drive, ide_find_best_pio_mode(drive));
-		return;
-	}
+	if (pio == 255)
+		pio = ide_get_best_pio_mode(drive, 255, 5);
amd_set_drive(drive, XFER_PIO_0 + min_t(byte, pio, 5));
 }

Erm, I don't get it -- why not just use ide_get_best_pio_mode() for every 'pio'? There should be no functionality changes, no?

Index: b/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /*
  *
- * Version 3.45
+ * Version 3.46
  *
  * VIA IDE driver for Linux. Supported southbridges:
  *
@@ -203,10 +203,8 @@ static int via_set_drive(ide_drive_t *dr
static void via82cxxx_tune_drive(ide_drive_t *drive, u8 pio)
 {
-	if (pio == 255) {
-		via_set_drive(drive, ide_find_best_pio_mode(drive));
-		return;
-	}
+	if (pio == 255)
+		pio = ide_get_best_pio_mode(drive, 255, 5);
via_set_drive(drive, XFER_PIO_0 + min_t(u8, pio, 5));

   Same question here...

MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux