Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ
storm
Why does the driver report "irq 0"?
ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd <blah> ctl <blah> bmdma <blah> irq 0 <====
Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20
Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ
values wrongly ?
AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it
remains broken...
2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the
port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have
been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree.
I've seen the patch that eventually became
22888423b3b1b96573250671afb5b72ea4364902 from Olof Johansson but nothing
from Tejun on the subject.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
