This patch was found to fix some of the problems with the pata_ali driver. Is it going to be merged in 2.6.22? [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=156482] --- linux-2.6.22-rc4/drivers/ata/pata_ali.c 2007-06-04 23:05:17.000000000 -0700 +++ devel/drivers/ata/pata_ali.c 2007-06-06 20:49:03.000000000 -0700 @@ -544,34 +628,34 @@ static int ali_init_one(struct pci_dev * /* Revision 0xC2 adds UDMA66 */ static const struct ata_port_info info_c2 = { .sht = &ali_sht, .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS | ATA_FLAG_SRST | ATA_FLAG_PIO_LBA48, .pio_mask = 0x1f, .mwdma_mask = 0x07, .udma_mask = 0x1f, .port_ops = &ali_c2_port_ops }; - /* Revision 0xC3 is UDMA100 */ + /* Revision 0xC3 is UDMA66 for now */ static const struct ata_port_info info_c3 = { .sht = &ali_sht, .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS | ATA_FLAG_SRST | ATA_FLAG_PIO_LBA48, .pio_mask = 0x1f, .mwdma_mask = 0x07, - .udma_mask = 0x3f, + .udma_mask = 0x1f, .port_ops = &ali_c2_port_ops }; - /* Revision 0xC4 is UDMA133 */ + /* Revision 0xC4 is UDMA100 */ static const struct ata_port_info info_c4 = { .sht = &ali_sht, .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS | ATA_FLAG_SRST | ATA_FLAG_PIO_LBA48, .pio_mask = 0x1f, .mwdma_mask = 0x07, - .udma_mask = 0x7f, + .udma_mask = 0x3f, .port_ops = &ali_c2_port_ops }; /* Revision 0xC5 is UDMA133 with LBA48 DMA */ static const struct ata_port_info info_c5 = { .sht = &ali_sht, .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS | ATA_FLAG_SRST, .pio_mask = 0x1f, .mwdma_mask = 0x07, .udma_mask = 0x7f, - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
