Petr Vandrovec wrote: >>> Hmmm... The last one (HTS541612J9SA00) is taken directly from hdparm >>> output, and I think I verified the patch with the reporter. Hmm... Can >>> anyone verify these module strings? >> >> Could well be that they've started attaching Hitachi to the ID strings >> now.. In the past it hasn't seemed to have been Hitachi's (and IBM's >> before that) practice to have it there, but maybe they see the >> advantage of being able to figure out who made the drive now :-) > > Perhaps ones sold directly by Hitachi are Hitachi, while ones sold > through OEMs are no-name? I dunno but I doubt they care that much about the model string but one way or the other we might have to do pattern matching on HTS541* anyway. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
