On Saturday 23 June 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
Hello, thanks for answering :-D
> Also could you try running UP kernel without PREEMPT and see
> if it makes difference?
Yes, it did make a difference. I've just tried both UP and SMP kernels
(22-rc5) *without* PREEMPT. Neither of these locked!
I also tried UP with PREEMPT and it locks.
> Adding a couple of printk-s to ide.c::set_using_dma() and
> ide.c::ide_spin_wait_hwgroup() will for sure help in debugging
> it further.
I just tried that as well. I placed printk-s when entering and exiting
these 2 functions and when they use spin_lock_irq() and
spin_unlock_irq(), and then watched the output:
I didn't see something odd. For every hdparm execution, set_using_dma()
is called, it successfully calls ide_spin_wait_hwgroup(), then
set_using_dma() finishes.
After set_using_dma() finishes, one more ide_spin_wait_hwgroup()
is called and finishes.
This pattern happens always, no matter if the kernel will eventually
lock (preempt) or not lock (no preempt), with absolutely no
differences.
entering ide.c::set_using_dma()
|
entering ide.c::ide_spin_wait_hwgroup()
ide.c::ide_spin_wait_hwgroup: LOCK
exiting ide.c::ide_spin_wait_hwgroup()
|
ide.c::set_using_dma: set ->busy flag, unlock and let it ride
ide.c::set_using_dma: UNLOCK
ide.c::set_using_dma: lock, clear ->busy flag and unlock before leaving
ide.c::set_using_dma: LOCK
ide.c::set_using_dma: UNLOCK
|
exiting ide.c::set_using_dma()
entering ide.c::ide_spin_wait_hwgroup()
ide.c::ide_spin_wait_hwgroup: LOCK
exiting ide.c::ide_spin_wait_hwgroup()
The above gets printed twice (one for the hda hdparm and one for hdb).
But I noticed something extra.
Sometimes, the ide_spin_wait_hwgroup() that runs either before the 1st
set_using_dma() or between the 1st and the 2nd (1st for hda, 2nd for
hdb) (*but never the one called last*) is waiting A LOT inside the busy
loop (while (hwgroup->busy)).
I think PREEMPT kernels always produce a lot of this while loop output,
and then print the above pattern, then lock.
Non-PREEMPT kernels don't always produce the huge while loop output,
only sometimes, but they never have locking problem.
I don't know if this is at all relevant to the problem. Perhaps it's
normal that during some of the bootups the IDE device group is busy
while during other bootups it's not busy, right ?
However, since all functions exit properly, should I try to place
printk-s in other functions as well ?
(I kind of need and appreciate guideance in order to help you, because
I've never been in the kernel hacking business before :) )
> Thanks,
> Bart
--
Thanos Kyritsis <djart at linux.gr>
- What's your ONE purpose in life ?
- To explode, of course! ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
