Re: libata interface fatal error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Florian Effenberger wrote:
>> I don't know.  Till now all the problem cases have been isolated to a
>> specific controller / drive combination (sata_promise and newer seagate
>> drives) or hardware configuration problem (most of them being PSU
>> issues), so I don't think we need such option yet.  If you have a
>> problematic hardware which pukes on 3.0Gbps, libata should do the right
>> thing after complaining a bit which IMHO isn't too bad.
> 
> So, loss of data or data corruption can't occur, even when we have to
> wait until the speed is limited?

Nope, there's nothing to worry about.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux