Albert Lee wrote:
Patch 1/6:
Update the ATA passthru protocol numbers according to the new spec.
Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <albertcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff -Nrup 00_libata-dev/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c 01_protocol_update/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
--- 00_libata-dev/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c 2007-06-01 12:08:21.000000000 +0800
+++ 01_protocol_update/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c 2007-06-07 11:38:50.000000000 +0800
@@ -2512,16 +2512,15 @@ ata_scsi_map_proto(u8 byte1)
case 5: /* PIO Data-out */
return ATA_PROT_PIO;
- case 10: /* Device Reset */
case 0: /* Hard Reset */
case 1: /* SRST */
- case 2: /* Bus Idle */
- case 7: /* Packet */
- case 8: /* DMA Queued */
- case 9: /* Device Diagnostic */
- case 11: /* UDMA Data-in */
- case 12: /* UDMA Data-Out */
- case 13: /* FPDMA */
+ case 8: /* Device Diagnostic */
+ case 9: /* Device Reset */
+ case 7: /* DMA Queued */
+ case 10: /* UDMA Data-in */
+ case 11: /* UDMA Data-Out */
+ case 12: /* FPDMA */
+ case 15: /* Return Response Info */
default: /* Reserved */
Ugh. Those idiots. YOUR patch is fine. But this is clearly an
incompatible change in the spec. If we had actually deployed code based
the spec, we would be up shit creek :/
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
