On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 04:36:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:28:22 -0400 > Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:40:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Seems best to me - we know the current code breaks a load of systems and > > > the change should not break anything but fix them all. If we ship without > > > it being changed then a load of people are stuck with broken ATA. > > > > So you have verified that Tejun's experimental change "fixes them all"? > > > > Proof? Bugzilla URLs pointing to users that have ack'd this fix? > > It unbreaks the IT821x, see the proposed patches I sent before for > discussion. Those are tested and do work. I've got a test case here and > its the case that the IT821x card doesn't get the magic trickery you rely > on right. Ah, I guess I misunderstood. I thought you were referring to Fedora 7 bug reports, since there are not a load of people with IT821x. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
