On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:02:24PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > I don't think the first one is probable considering BSY is supposed to > set when SRST is received. This is pretty fundamental in the protocol > and necessary for the device to work properly as master, so I think this > is one of few things we can rely upon. See a URL I posted earlier in this thread. With dumb ATAPI devices we actually have to wait a bit for BSY to be asserted. Not only at reset, but also for every command. > How about limiting nsect/lbal wait duration? Say, 100ms or 500ms? That > can somewhat ease our paranoia and should show acceptable behavior for > braindead devices too. That's quite reasonable. Jeff P.S. We can probably reduce the msleep(150) sprinkled about the code to msleep(100), for the dumb-ATAPI-device wait. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
