On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > I'm about to dive into some heads-down RHEL backporting (whee), so I cannot > look at the code in depth this weekend, but here are my basic thoughts: > > * We knew there would be fallout from the new reset-sequence code, and this is > clearly in that category. > > * It worked before #reset-seq merge AFAICT, which implies the old method of > probing -- which included SRST -- worked. Well, I don't think it really "worked" before. It apparently always had a bad 30-second timeout (probably because the reset just didn't work at all). It's just that the old code didn't care, and since the identify then worked, it was all good. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
