Re: sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007 11:45:03 -0600 Robert Hancock wrote:

Indan Zupancic wrote:
Everything seems to work fine without sd_resume(), so why is it needed?
Because not all disks spin up without being told to do so and like it or
not spinning disks up on resume is the default behavior.  As I wrote in
the other reply, it would be worthwhile to make it configurable.
Not even after they receive a read command? Ugh.
ATA disks are supposed to spin up, yes. SCSI disks require a command to tell them to spin up if they're in the "stopped" state.

Good info, but linux-ide was dropped.  Is that due to lack of
reply-to-all or is it a newsgroup thing or what?

That would be a newsgroup thing. It seems that sometimes CCs get dropped when the posts are forwarded to fa.linux.kernel where I normally read them.

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux