Re: [PATCH 8/8] libata: ack more unsolicited INTRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> As previously discussed, the possible issue with this patch is:
> Some ATA/ATAPI devices might be unhappy if the STATUS register
> is read during data transfer (not sure if this is true or not).
> (Patch 5/8 doesn't have such issue.) 

Some older intel eats your disk if you do that.

Neither of these approaches quite work. Much as I dislike the "old IDE"
disable/enable irq approach it does look like that is the only safe
answer for some controllers.

Alan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux