Re: [PATCH 5/7] libata: move and reduce locking to the pio data xfer functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This case is where I fail to understand how it's supposed to work.  If
> IRQ beats the clearing of the ignore irq flag && execution of completion
> routine from wq, it ignores the IRQ, right?  The IRQ line remains

I was assuming your polling handler would be polling and clearing the IRQ
status otherwise it doens't work anyway - cable noise or drive error and
an early DRQ de-assert would do the same thing during a transfer with IRQ
blocked only on the last dword.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux