Re: [PATCH 5/7] libata: move and reduce locking to the pio data xfer functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Albert Lee wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Albert Lee wrote:
>>
>>> -static void ata_pio_sector(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, int last)
>>> +static void ata_pio_sector(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, int last, int lock)
>>
>> I think the naming of @lock is a bit confusing here.  @clr_hsm_wq or
>> @last_sector, maybe?
>>
> 
> How about "irq_handover"? When set to "true", it means the workqueue is going to
> handover the control of the port to the irq handler.

Oops, forgot to write about this.  Yeah, that sounds good too.  I just
thought @lock was too vague.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux