Re: [PATCH] libata: disable_irq() during polling IDENTIFY (take 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
>> One thing I'm worried about is that somehow I'm thinking there are
>> controllers/devices out there which choke if there PIO data transfer is
>> interrupted (timing-wise).  Is this something I just imagined up?
> 
> There are a couple of problem controllers. They use the
> ata_data_xfer_noirq method for ->data_xfer() which blocks local
> interrupts in the method itself and in those cases we have no choice. Such
> chips are all ancient thankfully.

OIC, using separate data_xfer() definitely makes sense.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux