Re: [PATCH RFC v3 03/21] ACPI: processor: Register CPUs that are online, but not described in the DSDT
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 03/21] ACPI: processor: Register CPUs that are online, but not described in the DSDT
- From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:32:43 +0000
- Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, loongarch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, acpica-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>, jianyong.wu@xxxxxxx, justin.he@xxxxxxx, James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>, vishnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, miguel.luis@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20240129130354.0000042b@Huawei.com>
- References: <ZXmn46ptis59F0CO@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <E1rDOg2-00Dvjk-RI@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk> <CAJZ5v0ju1JHgpjuFLHZVs4NZiARG6iBZN_wza6c2e0kDhZjK0w@mail.gmail.com> <ZaURtUvWQyjYfiiO@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20240122160227.00002d83@Huawei.com> <CAJZ5v0hamuXJ_w-TSmVb=5jGide=Lb7sCjbzzNb_rFuPrvkgxQ@mail.gmail.com> <Za6mHRJVjb6M1mun@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20240123092725.00004382@Huawei.com> <20240129130354.0000042b@Huawei.com>
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 01:03:54PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> I poked this on x86 - it only applies with hotplug enabled anyway so
> same result as doing the hotplug later - All possible Processor() entries
> already exist in DSDT. Hence this isn't the source of the mysterious
> broken configuration.
>
> If anyone does poke this path, the old discussion between James
> and Salil provides some instructions (mostly the thread is about
> another issue).
> https://op-lists.linaro.org/archives/list/linaro-open-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/DNAGB2FB5ALVLV2BYWYOCLKGNF77PNXS/
>
> Also on x86 a test involving smp 2,max-cpus=4 and adding cpu-id 3
> (so skipping 2) doesn't boot. (this is without Salil's QEMU patches).
> I guess there are some well known rules in there that I don't know about
> and QEMU isn't preventing people shooting themselves in the foot.
>
> As I'm concerned, drop this patch.
> If there are platforms out there doing this wrong they'll surface once
> we get this into more test farms (so linux-next). If we need this
> 'fix' we can apply it when we have a problem firmware to point at.
Now dropped.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]