Potential config regression after 89cde455 ("kexec: consolidate kexec and crash options into kernel/Kconfig.kexec")
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: eric.devolder@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Potential config regression after 89cde455 ("kexec: consolidate kexec and crash options into kernel/Kconfig.kexec")
- From: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 22:52:52 +0000
- Cc: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, deller@xxxxxx, ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dalias@xxxxxxxx, glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, loongarch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxx, mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, npiggin@xxxxxxxxx, christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx, paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx, palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx, aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, frederic@xxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>, samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx, juerg.haefliger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx, sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rppt@xxxxxxxxxx, kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx, ziy@xxxxxxxxxx, masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx, ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx, mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx, ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx, thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx, xin3.li@xxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tsi@xxxxxxxxxx, bhe@xxxxxxxxxx, hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, sourabhjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team <kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Good day!
We have recently started to evaluate Linux 6.6 and noticed that we
cannot disable CONFIG_KEXEC anymore, but keep CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
enabled. It seems to be related to commit 89cde455 ("kexec:
consolidate kexec and crash options into kernel/Kconfig.kexec"), where
a CONFIG_KEXEC dependency was added to CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP.
In our current kernel (Linux 6.1) we only enable CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
with enforced signature check to support the kernel crash dumping
functionality and would like to keep CONFIG_KEXEC disabled for
security reasons [1].
I was reading the long commit message, but the reason for adding
CONFIG_KEXEC as a dependency for CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP evaded me. And I
believe from the implementation perspective CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE should
suffice here (as we successfully used it for crashdumps on Linux 6.1).
Is there a reason for adding this dependency or is it just an
oversight? Would some solution of requiring either CONFIG_KEXEC or
CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE work here?
Ignat
[1]: https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/28746.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]