Re: Add fchmodat2() - or add a more general syscall?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Add fchmodat2() - or add a more general syscall?
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 02:50:50 +1000
- Cc: Alexey Gladkov <legion@xxxxxxxxxx>, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, acme@xxxxxxxxxx, alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, christian@xxxxxxxxxx, dalias@xxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx, deller@xxxxxx, fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx, fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, glebfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hare@xxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jhogan@xxxxxxxxxx, kim.phillips@xxxxxxx, ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxx, mattst88@xxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, monstr@xxxxxxxxx, mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stefan@xxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, tycho@xxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <104971.1690300714@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
- References: <cover.1689092120.git.legion@kernel.org> <cover.1689074739.git.legion@kernel.org> <104971.1690300714@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On 2023-07-25, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rather than adding a fchmodat2() syscall, should we add a "set_file_attrs()"
> syscall that takes a mask and allows you to set a bunch of stuff all in one
> go? Basically, an interface to notify_change() in the kernel that would allow
> several stats to be set atomically. This might be of particular interest to
> network filesystems.
Presumably looking something like statx(2) (except hopefully with
extensible structs this time :P)? I think that could also be useful, but
given this is a fairly straight-forward syscall addition (and it also
would resolve the AT_EMPTY_PATH issue for chmod as well as simplify the
glibc wrapper), I think it makes sense to take this and we can do
set_statx(2) separately?
--
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]