Hi Am 29.06.23 um 15:31 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023, at 13:45, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:The variables screen_info and edid_info provide information about the system's screen, and possibly EDID data of the connected display. Both are defined and set by architecture code. But both variables are declared in non-arch header files. Dependencies are at bease loosely tracked. To resolve this, move the global state screen_info and its companion edid_info into arch/. Only declare them on architectures that define them. List dependencies on the variables in the Kconfig files. Also clean up the callers. Patch 1 to 4 resolve a number of unnecessary include statements of <linux/screen_info.h>. The header should only be included in source files that access struct screen_info. Patches 5 to 7 move the declaration of screen_info and edid_info to <asm-generic/screen_info.h>. Architectures that provide either set a Kconfig token to enable them. Patches 8 to 9 make users of screen_info depend on the architecture's feature. Finally, patches 10 to 12 rework fbdev's handling of firmware EDID data to make use of existing helpers and the refactored edid_info. Tested on x86-64. Built for a variety of platforms.This all looks like a nice cleanup!
I guess that patches 1 to 4 are uncontroversial and could be landed quickly. Patches 10 to 12 are probably as well.
Future directions: with the patchset in place, it will become possible to provide screen_info and edid_info only if there are users. Some architectures do this by testing for CONFIG_VT, CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE, etc. A more uniform approach would be nice. We should also attempt to minimize access to the global screen_info as much as possible. To do so, some drivers, such as efifb and vesafb, would require an update. The firmware's EDID data could possibly made available outside of fbdev. For example, the simpledrm and ofdrm drivers could provide such data to userspace compositors.I suspect that most architectures that provide a screen_info only have this in order to compile the framebuffer drivers, and provide hardcoded data that does not even reflect any real hardware.
That's quite possible. Only x86's bootparam and EFI code sets screen_info from external data. The rest is hardcoded. A number of architectures protect screen_info with CONFIG_VT, CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE, etc. In a later patchset, I wanted to change this such that these users of screen_info would enable the feature via select in their Kconfig.
Do you know the reason for this branch in dummycon: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4/source/drivers/video/console/dummycon.c#L21 What is special about arm that dummycon uses the screeninfo?
We can probably reduce the number of architectures that do this a lot, especially if we get EFI out of the picture.
Can you elaborate? Best regards Thomas
Arnd
-- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|