Re: [PATCH] cachestat: wire up cachestat for other architectures
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] cachestat: wire up cachestat for other architectures
- From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 12:34:23 -0700
- Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx, ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mattst88@xxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, monstr@xxxxxxxxx, tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, deller@xxxxxx, npiggin@xxxxxxxxx, christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx, hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dalias@xxxxxxxx, glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chris@xxxxxxxxxx, jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <874joja6vz.fsf@mail.lhotse>
- References: <20230510195806.2902878-1-nphamcs@gmail.com> <874joja6vz.fsf@mail.lhotse>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:23 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > cachestat is previously only wired in for x86 (and architectures using
> > the generic unistd.h table):
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230503013608.2431726-1-nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > This patch wires cachestat in for all the other architectures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/alpha/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 +
> > arch/arm/tools/syscall.tbl | 1 +
> > arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 +
> > arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 +
> > arch/microblaze/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 +
> > arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl | 1 +
> > arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl | 1 +
> > arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 1 +
> > arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 +
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 +
>
> With the change to the selftest (see my other mail), I tested this on
> powerpc and all tests pass.
Saw the change you proposed, Michael! It looks good to me.
Thanks for helping me make the selftest suite more robust :)
>
> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (powerpc)
>
>
> cheers
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]