Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Retire IA64/Itanium support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Pedro Miguel Justo <pmsjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Retire IA64/Itanium support
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:32:03 +0100
- Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CO1PR13MB48707CAD2AFD26D4B6D11321C8A09@CO1PR13MB4870.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <CO1PR13MB48707CAD2AFD26D4B6D11321C8A09@CO1PR13MB4870.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 18:43, Pedro Miguel Justo <pmsjt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Ard.
>
> John is not the "only remaining user". I also reported the problem. I am sorry I don't update the kernel every month. Yes there might have been more than 30 days between updates.
>
Thanks for the report.
Apologies if that sounded a bit callous but it does help get some
clarity regarding the ia64 situation. Essentially, we have a very
small number of downstream users but no dedicated developers or
maintainers. That is still not a great situation.
> I'd prefer if we don't remove the Itanium McKinley+ support but I'll understand if it must.
>
If you are invested in keeping Itanium alive, how much effort would
you be willing to spend yourself on testing and reviewing Itanium
changes?
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]