Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Retire IA64/Itanium support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Retire IA64/Itanium support
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:04:53 +0200
- Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CAHk-=wj9RkLN+GpYcFmsd8tze6zYL7MMkNpvdKbETQnqYm+Hwg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20230215100008.2565237-1-ardb@kernel.org> <534469b750e1847e1645f9ae5ed19dcc80b82be6.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <CAHk-=wjEmZ19T4XpVb0_Hacm53xJG_w5ygcuorwC0xBoT-myUA@mail.gmail.com> <SJ1PR11MB6083F7F30FE9ED8F39FA1F85FCA39@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAHk-=wj9RkLN+GpYcFmsd8tze6zYL7MMkNpvdKbETQnqYm+Hwg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:08:28PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:43 AM Luck, Tony <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe you don't see others pain? I added Al Viro ... perhaps
> > he'll replay some of his thoughts from trying to make signals
> > and other stuff work correctly on ia64.
>
> Well, as long as it's ia64-specific, I'll just go "hey, it was Al's
> choice to look at that code".
>
> IOW, I'm more worried about "ia64 makes it a pain to make _generic_ changes".
>
> IOW, doing something like this:
>
> git log -p --no-merges --since=1.year arch/ia64/
>
> to see what kind of pain ia64 parts of patches have caused, about a
> third of them are that "look, somebody cared about ia64 explicitly".
I remember that when I was doing cleanups of mm initialization, ia64
required special care several times.
> That said, it's entirely possible I've missed some particular painpoint.
The largest painpoint IMO is absence of any ability to test ia64 except
sending patches to Adrian in a hope he has time to give them a whirl.
> Linus
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]