Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] kernel: Drop IA64 support from sig_fault handlers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] kernel: Drop IA64 support from sig_fault handlers
- From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:19:18 +0100
- Cc: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@xxxxxxx>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jessica Clarke" <jrtc27@xxxxxxxxxx>, "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Feedback-id: i56a14606:Fastmail
- In-reply-to: <20230215100008.2565237-3-ardb@kernel.org>
- References: <20230215100008.2565237-1-ardb@kernel.org> <20230215100008.2565237-3-ardb@kernel.org>
- User-agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-156-g081acc5ed5-fm-20230206.001-g081acc5e
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023, at 11:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/sched/signal.h | 17 ++++---------
> kernel/signal.c | 25 ++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
The patch looks good, but I'd suggest adding a oneline description
referencing that ia64 as a whole is removed.
I see that you created a couple of patches looking for __ia64__
but not CONFIG_IA64. If we get consensus on patch 1, we should
do that as well, let me know if you you want to add those or
would like me to help here.
I can probably do the same recursive check for removed Kconfig
options that I used for finding dead code after the boardfile
removal.
Arnd
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]