Re: [PATCH 05/22] csky/cpu: Make sure arch_cpu_idle_dead() doesn't return
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22] csky/cpu: Make sure arch_cpu_idle_dead() doesn't return
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:29:32 -0800
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx, ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mattst88@xxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxx, loongarch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx, tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx, mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, npiggin@xxxxxxxxx, christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dalias@xxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, chris@xxxxxxxxxx, jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, bristot@xxxxxxxxxx, vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAJF2gTSKe3ve4_rsOYpmSBOyUSU5rpLHyijn9i2-i+WfLqxzYw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <cover.1675461757.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org> <f860f3a1c1a53c437a99abc53e8f1a798aef6881.1675461757.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org> <CAJF2gTSKe3ve4_rsOYpmSBOyUSU5rpLHyijn9i2-i+WfLqxzYw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 09:12:31AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 6:05 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > arch_cpu_idle_dead() doesn't return. Make that more explicit with a
> > BUG().
> >
> > BUG() is preferable to unreachable() because BUG() is a more explicit
> > failure mode and avoids undefined behavior like falling off the edge of
> > the function into whatever code happens to be next.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/csky/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/csky/kernel/smp.c b/arch/csky/kernel/smp.c
> > index b45d1073307f..0ec20efaf5fd 100644
> > --- a/arch/csky/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/csky/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -317,5 +317,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
> > "jmpi csky_start_secondary"
> > :
> > : "r" (secondary_stack));
> > +
> > + BUG();
> Why not:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index f26ab2675f7d..1d3bf903add2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ static void do_idle(void)
> tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
> cpuhp_report_idle_dead();
> arch_cpu_idle_dead();
> + BUG();
Without the BUG() in csky arch_cpu_idle_dead(), the compiler will warn
about arch_cpu_idle_dead() returning, because it's marked __noreturn but
doesn't clearly return (as far as the compiler knows).
And we want it marked __noreturn so we'll be more likely to catch such
bugs at build time.
And as a bonus we get better code generation and clearer code semantics
which helps both humans and tooling understand the intent of the code.
--
Josh
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]