Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Generic IPI sending tracepoint
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Generic IPI sending tracepoint
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:41:43 -0400
- Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, loongarch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openrisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <xhsmhfsfufh51.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
- References: <20221007154145.1877054-1-vschneid@redhat.com> <Y0CFnWDpMNGajIRD@fuller.cnet> <xhsmhilkqfi7z.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb> <3e680bb9-9896-3665-dd59-4f2e6f8205bb@redhat.com> <xhsmhfsfufh51.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 17:40:26 +0100
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > You could keep the tracepoint as a mask, and then make it pretty, like cpus=3-5,8
> > in user-space. For example with a trace-cmd/perf loadable plugin, libtracefs helper.
> >
>
> That's a nice idea, the one downside I see is that means registering an
> event handler for all events with cpumasks rather than directly targeting
> cpumask fields, but that doesn't look too horrible. I'll dig a bit in that
> direction.
We could just make all all dynamic array's of unsigned long use that
format? I don't know of any other event that has dynamic arrays of
unsigned longs. And doing a search doesn't come up with any.
-- Steve
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]