Re: [PATCH v2 33/44] ftrace: WARN on rcuidle
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 33/44] ftrace: WARN on rcuidle
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:41:57 -0400
- Cc: richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx, ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mattst88@xxxxxxxxx, vgupta@xxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ulli.kroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx, shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, festevam@xxxxxxxxx, linux-imx@xxxxxxx, tony@xxxxxxxxxxx, khilman@xxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx, bcain@xxxxxxxxxxx, chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxx, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sammy@xxxxxxxxx, monstr@xxxxxxxxx, tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx, jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx, stefan.kristiansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, shorne@xxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, deller@xxxxxx, mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, npiggin@xxxxxxxxx, christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx, paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx, palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx, aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dalias@xxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, richard@xxxxxx, anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, acme@xxxxxxxxxx, mark.rutland@xxxxxxx, alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx, namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, srivatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, amakhalov@xxxxxxxxxx, pv-drivers@xxxxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, chris@xxxxxxxxxx, jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx, rafael@xxxxxxxxxx, lenb@xxxxxxxxxx, pavel@xxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx, sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx, lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx, sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx, agross@xxxxxxxxxx, bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx, konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx, jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx, jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dennis@xxxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, cl@xxxxxxxxx, pmladek@xxxxxxxx, senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx, john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, bristot@xxxxxxxxxx, vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx, fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx, ryabinin.a.a@xxxxxxxxx, glider@xxxxxxxxxx, andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxx, dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx, vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, loongarch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openrisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20220919101522.573936213@infradead.org>
- References: <20220919095939.761690562@infradead.org> <20220919101522.573936213@infradead.org>
Nit, the subject should have "tracing:" an not "ftrace:" as the former
encompasses the tracing infrastructure and the latter is for the function
hook part of that.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 12:00:12 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY disallows any and all tracing when RCU isn't
> enabled.
>
> XXX if s390 (the only other GENERIC_ENTRY user as of this writing)
> isn't comfortable with this, we could switch to
> HAVE_NOINSTR_VALIDATION which is x86_64 only atm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/tracepoint.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,16 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepo
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL */
>
> /*
> + * CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY archs are expected to have sanitized entry and idle
> + * code that disallow any/all tracing/instrumentation when RCU isn't watching.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY
> +#define RCUIDLE_COND(rcuidle) (rcuidle)
> +#else
Should probably move the below comment to here:
/* srcu can't be used from NMI */
> +#define RCUIDLE_COND(rcuidle) (rcuidle && in_nmi())
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
> * it_func[0] is never NULL because there is at least one element in the array
> * when the array itself is non NULL.
> */
> @@ -189,7 +199,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepo
> return; \
> \
> /* srcu can't be used from NMI */ \
And remove the above.
-- Steve
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(rcuidle && in_nmi()); \
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(RCUIDLE_COND(rcuidle))) \
> + return; \
> \
> /* keep srcu and sched-rcu usage consistent */ \
> preempt_disable_notrace(); \
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -3104,6 +3104,9 @@ void __trace_stack(struct trace_array *t
> return;
> }
>
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY)))
> + return;
> +
> /*
> * When an NMI triggers, RCU is enabled via ct_nmi_enter(),
> * but if the above rcu_is_watching() failed, then the NMI
>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]