Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants
- From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 19:58:11 -0700
- Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>, Brian Cain <bcain@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>, kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, llvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20220630165611.1551808-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
- References: <20220624121313.2382500-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> <20220630165611.1551808-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 06:56:11PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:13:04 +0200
>
> > While I was working on converting some structure fields from a fixed
> > type to a bitmap, I started observing code size increase not only in
> > places where the code works with the converted structure fields, but
> > also where the converted vars were on the stack. That said, the
> > following code:
>
> Hey,
>
> Seems like everything is fine this time. I got some reports, but
> those aren't caused by any of the changes from the series.
> Maybe we can take it to -next and see how it goes?
Applied on github.com:/norov/linux.git branch bitmap-for-next
Thanks!
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]