Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 02:49:29PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 05:25:10PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Thinking more about it we actually need to drop the xen_initial_domain()
> > > check otherwise some cases won't be functional (Dom0 not 1:1 mapped, or
> > > DomU 1:1 mapped).
> > 
> > Hmm, but that would be the case even before this series, right?
> 
> Before this series we only have the xen_swiotlb_detect() check in
> xen_mm_init, we don't have a second xen_initial_domain() check.
> 
> The issue is that this series is adding one more xen_initial_domain()
> check in xen_mm_init.

In current mainline xen_mm_init calls xen_swiotlb_init unconditionally.
But xen_swiotlb_init then calls xen_swiotlb_fixup after allocating
the memory, which in turn calls xen_create_contiguous_region.
xen_create_contiguous_region fails with -EINVAL for the
!xen_initial_domain() and thus caues xen_swiotlb_fixup and
xen_swiotlb_init to unwind and return -EINVAL.

So as far as I can tell there is no change in behavior, but maybe I'm
missing something subtle?