Re: [PATCH v2 09/18] mips: use simpler access_ok()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/18] mips: use simpler access_ok()
- From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:41:27 +0100
- Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx, bcain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, monstr@xxxxxxxxx, nickhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, green.hu@xxxxxxxxx, dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx, shorne@xxxxxxxxx, deller@xxxxxx, mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, mark.rutland@xxxxxxx, hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dalias@xxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, richard@xxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx, ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ardb@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openrisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20220216131332.1489939-10-arnd@kernel.org>
- References: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20220216131332.1489939-10-arnd@kernel.org>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 02:13:23PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index db9a8e002b62..d7c89dc3426c 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
>
> #define __UA_LIMIT 0x80000000UL
> +#define TASK_SIZE_MAX __UA_LIMIT
using KSEG0 instead would IMHO be the better choice. This gives the
chance to remove __UA_LIMIT completly after cleaning up ptrace.c
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]