Re: [PATCH][next] treewide: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] treewide: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:05:47 +0100
- Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux-sh list <linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, intel-gfx <intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dri-devel <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nouveau <nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, coresight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:TARGET SUBSYSTEM" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-staging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rpi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparmaintainer@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arch <linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-i3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." <alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20220215193221.GA884407@embeddedor>
- References: <20220215174743.GA878920@embeddedor> <202202151016.C0471D6E@keescook> <20220215192110.GA883653@embeddedor> <Ygv8wY75hNqS7zO6@unreal> <20220215193221.GA884407@embeddedor>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:24 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:19:29PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:21:10PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:17:40AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:47:43AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > >
> > > > These all look trivially correct to me. Only two didn't have the end of
> > > > the struct visible in the patch, and checking those showed them to be
> > > > trailing members as well, so:
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > I'll add this to my -next tree.
> >
> > I would like to ask you to send mlx5 patch separately to netdev. We are working
> > to delete that file completely and prefer to avoid from unnecessary merge conflicts.
>
> Oh OK. Sure thing; I will do so.
Can you also send the ACPI patch separately, please?
We would like to route it through the upstream ACPICA code base.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]
