Re: [PATCH 2/8] kernel/fork: Duplicate task_struct before stack allocation.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] kernel/fork: Duplicate task_struct before stack allocation.
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:39:05 +0100
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ben Segall <bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <8340d413-4951-5e62-ef5f-f396523edac7@kernel.org>
- References: <20220125152652.1963111-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20220125152652.1963111-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <8340d413-4951-5e62-ef5f-f396523edac7@kernel.org>
On 2022-02-11 15:42:38 [-0800], Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 1/25/22 07:26, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > alloc_thread_stack_node() already populates the task_struct::stack
> > member except on IA64. The stack pointer is saved and populated again
> > because IA64 needs it and arch_dup_task_struct() overwrites it.
>
> I understand the problem, I think.
>
> >
> > Allocate thread's stack after task_struct has been duplicated as a
> > preparation.
> >
>
> But I don't understand this. How does this patch relate to the problem?
So I duplicate the task-struct, assign the stack pointer in
alloc_thread_stack_node() with no need to update the stack pointer
later. Otherwise arch_dup_task_struct() would reset the pointer.
> Also, you appear to be missing a change to the free_stack and free_tsk code
> at the end of dup_task_struct().
It looks right. What am I missing?
Sebastian
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]