Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] kdump: simplify code
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Tiezhu Yang'" <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>, Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] kdump: simplify code
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 19:32:16 +0000
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Cc: "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <0c5cb37139af4f3e85cc2c5115d7d006@AcuMS.aculab.com>
- References: <1639193588-7027-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> <0c5cb37139af4f3e85cc2c5115d7d006@AcuMS.aculab.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Le 11/12/2021 à 18:53, David Laight a écrit :
> From: Tiezhu Yang
>> Sent: 11 December 2021 03:33
>>
>> v2:
>> -- add copy_to_user_or_kernel() in lib/usercopy.c
>> -- define userbuf as bool type
>
> Instead of having a flag to indicate whether the buffer is user or kernel,
> would it be better to have two separate buffer pointers.
> One for a user space buffer, the other for a kernel space buffer.
> Exactly one of the buffers should always be NULL.
>
> That way the flag is never incorrectly set.
>
It's a very good idea.
I was worried about the casts forcing the __user property away and back.
With that approach we will preserve the __user tags on user buffers and
enable sparse checking.
The only little drawback I see is that apparently GCC doesn't consider
the NULL value as a constant and therefore doesn't perform constant
folding on pointers. Not sure if this is a problem here.
Christophe
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]