Re: [PATCH -tip v8 11/13] x86/unwind: Recover kretprobe trampoline entry

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:07:06PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> @@ -549,7 +548,15 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
>  					 (void *)orig_ip);
>  			goto err;
>  		}
> -
> +		/*
> +		 * There is a small chance to interrupt at the entry of
> +		 * kretprobe_trampoline where the ORC info doesn't exist.
> +		 * That point is right after the RET to kretprobe_trampoline
> +		 * which was modified return address. So the @addr_p must
> +		 * be right before the regs->sp.
> +		 */
> +		state->ip = unwind_recover_kretprobe(state, state->ip,
> +				(unsigned long *)(state->sp - sizeof(long)));
>  		state->regs = (struct pt_regs *)sp;
>  		state->prev_regs = NULL;
>  		state->full_regs = true;
> @@ -562,6 +569,9 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
>  					 (void *)orig_ip);
>  			goto err;
>  		}
> +		/* See UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_REGS case comment. */
> +		state->ip = unwind_recover_kretprobe(state, state->ip,
> +				(unsigned long *)(state->sp - sizeof(long)));
>  
>  		if (state->full_regs)
>  			state->prev_regs = state->regs;

Why doesn't the ftrace case have this? That is, why aren't both return
trampolines having the same general shape?