Hi Sergei!
On 3/17/21 10:14 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Or is it just an early bootstrap message assuming more are to come?
>
> Could it be that we initialize too little of generic acpi boilerplace
> when there is no SRAT? Somewhere around:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c#n446
>
> arm64 and riscv calls `arch_numa_init()` and initializes numa node
> data in numa_init().
> While ia64 only calls acpi_numa_init() but not arch_acpi_numa_init()
> (which would do numa_init() for us).
>
> x86 seems to vaguely resemble generic code by duplicating numa_init().
>
> (UNTESTED) Could it be that we need something like:
>
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ setup_arch (char **cmdline_p)
> acpi_table_init();
> early_acpi_boot_init();
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> - acpi_numa_init();
> + arch_numa_init();
> acpi_numa_fixup();
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
> prefill_possible_map();
That doesn't build:
CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
<stdin>:1511:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp]
CHK include/generated/compile.h
CC arch/ia64/kernel/setup.o
CC arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.o
arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch':
arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c:574:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_numa_init'; did you mean 'acpi_numa_init'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
574 | arch_numa_init();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| acpi_numa_init
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:271: arch/ia64/kernel/setup.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [Makefile:1851: arch/ia64/kernel] Error 2
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
|