RE: [PATCH] hpsa: fix boot on ia64 (atomic_t alignment)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'Martin K. Petersen'" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [PATCH] hpsa: fix boot on ia64 (atomic_t alignment)
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:19:23 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Cc: "Don.Brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Don.Brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "storagedev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <storagedev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jszczype@xxxxxxxxxx" <jszczype@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Scott.Benesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Scott.Benesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Scott.Teel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Scott.Teel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx" <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>, "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <yq1zgz21rkz.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
- References: <5532f9ab-7555-d51b-f4d5-f9b72a61f248@redhat.com> <20210312222718.4117508-1-slyfox@gentoo.org> <SN6PR11MB2848561E3D85A8F55EB86977E16B9@SN6PR11MB2848.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAK8P3a3JYmhbN3TXB2cWGfXGKgsUa9Hg=ZvWckTaL_31OMgbtQ@mail.gmail.com> <yq1zgz21rkz.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
From: Martin K. Petersen
> Sent: 17 March 2021 02:26
>
> Arnd,
>
> > Actually that still feels wrong: the annotation of the struct is to
> > pack every member, which causes the access to be done in byte units on
> > architectures that do not have hardware unaligned load/store
> > instructions, at least for things like atomic_read() that does not go
> > through a cmpxchg() or ll/sc cycle.
>
> > This change may fix itanium, but it's still not correct. Other
> > architectures would have already been broken before the recent change,
> > but that's not a reason against fixing them now.
>
> I agree. I understand why there are restrictions on fields consumed by
> the hardware. But for fields internal to the driver the packing doesn't
> make sense to me.
Jeepers -- that global #pragma pack(1) is bollocks.
I think there are a couple of __u64 that are 32bit aligned.
Just marking those field __packed __aligned(4) should have
the desired effect.
Or use a typedef for '__u64 with 32bit alignment'.
(There probably ought to be one in types.h)
Then add compile-time asserts that any non-trivial structures
the hardware accesses are the right size.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]