Re: [PATCH 22/28] sgiseeq: convert from dma_cache_sync to dma_sync_single_for_device
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/28] sgiseeq: convert from dma_cache_sync to dma_sync_single_for_device
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:46:43 +0200
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>, Pawel Osciak <pawel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20200903084302.GB24410@lst.de>
- References: <20200819065555.1802761-1-hch@lst.de> <20200819065555.1802761-23-hch@lst.de> <20200901152209.GA14288@alpha.franken.de> <20200901171241.GA20685@alpha.franken.de> <20200901171627.GA8255@lst.de> <20200901173810.GA25282@alpha.franken.de> <20200903084302.GB24410@lst.de>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:43:02AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:38:10PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > this is the problem:
> >
> > /* Always check for received packets. */
> > sgiseeq_rx(dev, sp, hregs, sregs);
> >
> > so the driver will look at the rx descriptor on every interrupt, so
> > we cache the rx descriptor on the first interrupt and if there was
> > $no rx packet, we will only see it, if cache line gets flushed for
> > some other reason.
>
> That means a transfer back to device ownership is missing after a
> (negative) check.
E.g. something like this for the particular problem, although there
might be other hiding elsewhere:
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
index 8507ff2420143a..a1c7be8a0d1e5d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
@@ -403,6 +403,8 @@ static inline void sgiseeq_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct sgiseeq_private *sp
rd = &sp->rx_desc[sp->rx_new];
dma_sync_desc_cpu(dev, rd);
}
+ dma_sync_desc_dev(dev, rd);
+
dma_sync_desc_cpu(dev, &sp->rx_desc[orig_end]);
sp->rx_desc[orig_end].rdma.cntinfo &= ~(HPCDMA_EOR);
dma_sync_desc_dev(dev, &sp->rx_desc[orig_end]);
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]