Re: [PATCH 05/28] media/v4l2: remove V4L2-FLAG-MEMORY-NON-CONSISTENT
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] media/v4l2: remove V4L2-FLAG-MEMORY-NON-CONSISTENT
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:43:47 +0200
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>, Pawel Osciak <pawel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "list@xxxxxxx:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>," <iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "list@xxxxxxx:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>," <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CAAFQd5BuXP7t3d-Rwft85j=KTyXq7y4s24mQxLr=VoY9krEGZw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20200819065555.1802761-1-hch@lst.de> <20200819065555.1802761-6-hch@lst.de> <CAAFQd5COLxjydDYrfx47ht8tj-aNPiaVnC+WyQA7nvpW4gs=ww@mail.gmail.com> <20200819135454.GA17098@lst.de> <CAAFQd5BuXP7t3d-Rwft85j=KTyXq7y4s24mQxLr=VoY9krEGZw@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:57:53PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Could you explain what makes you think it's unused? It's a feature of
> > > the UAPI generally supported by the videobuf2 framework and relied on
> > > by Chromium OS to get any kind of reasonable performance when
> > > accessing V4L2 buffers in the userspace.
> >
> > Because it doesn't do anything except on PARISC and non-coherent MIPS,
> > so by definition it isn't used by any of these media drivers.
>
> It's still an UAPI feature, so we can't simply remove the flag, it
> must stay there as a no-op, until the problem is resolved.
Ok, I'll switch to just ignoring it for the next version.
> Also, it of course might be disputable as an out-of-tree usage, but
> selecting CONFIG_DMA_NONCOHERENT_CACHE_SYNC makes the flag actually do
> something on other platforms, including ARM64.
It isn't just disputable, but by kernel policies simply is not relevant.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]