Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq()
- From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:37:13 +0530
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rpi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-c6x-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>, Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@xxxxxxx>, Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@xxxxxxx>, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
- References: <cover.1581478323.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> <87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:31:15AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Vs. merging this series, I suggest the following approach:
>
> - Resubmit the individual changes as single patches or small series
> to the relevant maintainers and subsystem mailing lists. They have
> no dependency on a core change and can be applied where they belong
> to.
>
> - After 5.6-rc6, verify which parts have made their way into
> linux-next and resubmit the ignored ones as a series to me along
> with the removal of the core parts.
>
> That way we can avoid conflicting changes between subsystems and the tip
> irq/core branch as much as possible.
Okay, i will do accordingly.
[ your mail crossed my v3 (only one patch) posting ]
Regards
afzal
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]