Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] mm: remove __ARCH_HAS_5LEVEL_HACK
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] mm: remove __ARCH_HAS_5LEVEL_HACK
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 11:45:59 +0100
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Cain <bcain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@xxxxxxxxxx>, James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>, Jonas Bonn <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@xxxxxxxxx>, Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@xxxxxxxxx>, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>, Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>, Stafford Horne <shorne@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nios2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openrisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, uclinux-h8-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20200216082230.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
- References: <20200216081843.28670-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20200216082230.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
Le 16/02/2020 à 09:22, Russell King - ARM Linux admin a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:18:30AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
These patches convert several architectures to use page table folding and
remove __ARCH_HAS_5LEVEL_HACK along with include/asm-generic/5level-fixup.h.
The changes are mostly about mechanical replacement of pgd accessors with p4d
ones and the addition of higher levels to page table traversals.
All the patches were sent separately to the respective arch lists and
maintainers hence the "v2" prefix.
You fail to explain why this change which adds 488 additional lines of
code is desirable.
The purpose of the series, ie droping a HACK, is worth it.
However looking at the powerpc patch I have the feeling that this series
goes behind its purpose.
The number additional lines could be deeply reduced I think if we limit
the patches to the strict minimum, ie just do things like below instead
of adding lots of handling of useless levels.
Instead of doing things like:
- pud = NULL;
+ p4d = NULL;
if (pgd_present(*pgd))
- pud = pud_offset(pgd, gpa);
+ p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, gpa);
+ else
+ new_p4d = p4d_alloc_one(kvm->mm, gpa);
+
+ pud = NULL;
+ if (p4d_present(*p4d))
+ pud = pud_offset(p4d, gpa);
else
new_pud = pud_alloc_one(kvm->mm, gpa);
It could be limited to:
if (pgd_present(*pgd))
- pud = pud_offset(pgd, gpa);
+ pud = pud_offset(p4d_offset(pgd, gpa), gpa);
else
new_pud = pud_alloc_one(kvm->mm, gpa);
Christophe
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]