Re: [PATCH 10/21] asm-generic: ioremap_uc should behave the same with and without MMU
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] asm-generic: ioremap_uc should behave the same with and without MMU
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:33:17 +0100
- Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>, Greentime Hu <green.hu@xxxxxxxxx>, Vincent Chen <deanbo422@xxxxxxxxx>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@xxxxxxxxxx>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, alpha <linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE" <linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "moderated list:NIOS2 ARCHITECTURE" <nios2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, openrisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Parisc List <linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390 <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-sh list <linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, sparclinux <sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd <linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arch <linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20191111102923.GA12974@lst.de>
- References: <20191029064834.23438-1-hch@lst.de> <20191029064834.23438-11-hch@lst.de> <CAK8P3a2o4R+E2hTrHrmNy7K1ki3_98aWE5a-fjkQ_NWW=xd_gQ@mail.gmail.com> <20191111101531.GA12294@lst.de> <CAK8P3a0rTvfPP2LUMw8EC0xz5gfZP5+NUkoaZBJrtYYfr6YRig@mail.gmail.com> <20191111102923.GA12974@lst.de>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:29 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Ok, fair enough. Let's just go with your version for now, if only to not
> > hold your series up more. I'd still suggest we change atyfb to only
> > use ioremap_uc() on i386 and maybe ia64. I can send a patch for that.
>
> I don't think we even need it on ia64. But lets kick off a dicussion
> with the atyfb, x86 and ia64 maintainers after this series is in.
> Which was kinda my plan anyway.
I missed your reply and already sent my patch now. I guess it doesn't
hurt to discuss that in parallel. Anyway I think that this patch is the
last one you want an Ack from me for (let me know if I missed one), so
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]
