RE: [GIT PULL] ia64 changes for v5.4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] ia64 changes for v5.4
- From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:11:49 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Cc: "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx>
- Dlp-product: dlpe-windows
- Dlp-reaction: no-action
- Dlp-version: 11.2.0.6
- In-reply-to: <CAHk-=wj9uPRcTPVDh4O73n6xX0KdYTTO=FrQC4iWsrF4WWeFQw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20190916154903.GA18169@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <CAHk-=wj9uPRcTPVDh4O73n6xX0KdYTTO=FrQC4iWsrF4WWeFQw@mail.gmail.com>
> .. and the remaining ia64 code now doesn't need the odd IO coherency
> contortions, right? That was all SN?
IIRC yes ... SN had the weird stuff where you had to twist into a pretzel
to guarantee ordering of operations between different "nodes".
-Tony
BTW - I forgot to mention in the pull request that intel-next had a few small
merge issues with other trees because of stuff deleted, or tweaks to the
ia64 Kconfig file.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]